Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Brooks on behalf of the Mamu People v State of Queensland (No 4) [2013] FCA 1453 Citation: Brooks on behalf of the Mamu People v State of Queensland (No 4) [2013] FCA 1453
Parties: STEPHEN BROOKS, ALFRED JOYCE, VICTOR MAUND, DEAN PURCELL, ANTHONY EDWARDS, HENRY EPONG AND BRENDA MATHESON ON BEHALF OF THE MAMU PEOPLE v STATE OF QUEENSLAND, CAIRNS REGIONAL COUNCIL, CASSOWARY COAST REGIONAL COUNCIL, TABLELANDS REGIONAL COUNCIL, ERGON ENERGY CORPORATION LIMITED and GREGORY LEIGH BINDER, WAYNE DOUGLAS BUIE, DAVID CARACCIOLO, JOHN COOK, MARIO CORICA, NEVILLE DAVIES, RON FORSTER, MARIE GIDDINS, ROBERT GIDDINS, BRIAN HART, STEVEN HOWE, LARRY JONES, NORBERT KUROWSKI, WILLIAM JAMES LANE, PETER JORG PAHLKE, STEPHEN PENSINI, MARK DAVID RYAN, MARTIN SCHENCKEL, MICHAEL JOHN SCHULZ, JOHN NICHOLAS TAIFALOS, MICHAEL J TAIFALOS, JAMES ARTHUR TODD, LORNA KIRI WELSFORD, IAN WHITEHOUSE AND BARRY WILSON
File number: QUD 6014 of 2001
Judge: DOWSETT J
Date of consent determination: 1 November 2013
Place: Innisfail
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 30
Solicitor for the Applicant: Mr N Hales of Miller Harris Lawyers
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Ms P Dupuy of Crown Law
Solicitor for the Second, Third and Fourth Respondents: Mr A Kerr of Preston Law
Solicitor for the Fifth and Sixth Respondents: The Fifth and Sixth Respondents did not appear
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate