Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Harradine v State of Victoria [2013] FCA 1458 Citation: Harradine v State of Victoria [2013] FCA 1458
Parties: FREDERICK RALPH HARRADINE and LATJI LATJI PEOPLE v STATE OF VICTORIA and others named in the schedule
File number: VID 6003 of 2000
Judge: NORTH J
Date of judgment: 17 December 2013
Date of hearing: 17 December 2013
Place: Melbourne
Category: GENERAL DIVISION
Number of paragraphs: 8
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr T Kelly
Solicitor for the Applicant: J N Zigouras & Co Lawyers
Solicitor for the State of Victoria: Ms M Scalzo of the Victorian Government Solicitor's Office
Solicitor for the Commonwealth: Mr C Rawson of the Australian Government Solicitor
Solicitor for Telstra: Ms M Barnett-Smith of Ashurst Australia
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 6003 of 2000
BETWEEN: FREDERICK RALPH HARRADINE ON BEHALF OF THE LATJI LATJI PEOPLE
Applicant
AND: STATE OF VICTORIA and others named in the schedule
Respondent
JUDGE: NORTH J DATE OF ORDER: 17 DECEMBER 2013 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application is dismissed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 6003 of 2000
BETWEEN: FREDERICK RALPH HARRADINE ON BEHALF OF THE LATJI LATJI PEOPLE
Applicant
AND: STATE OF VICTORIA and others named in the schedule
Respondent
JUDGE: NORTH J DATE: 17 DECEMBER 2013 PLACE: MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate