Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Executor Trustees Ltd v Provident Capital Ltd, in the matter of Provident Capital Ltd (receivers and managers appointed) (in liq) [2013] FCA 1461 Citation: Australian Executor Trustees Ltd v Provident Capital Ltd, in the matter of Provident Capital Ltd (receivers and managers appointed) (in liq) [2013] FCA 1461
Parties: AUSTRALIAN EXECUTOR TRUSTEES LIMITED ACN 007 869 794 v PROVIDENT CAPITAL LIMITED ACN 982 735 573 (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) (IN LIQUIDATION)
File number: NSD 808 of 2012
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 24 December 2013
Catchwords: TRUSTS AND TRUSTEES – Court-appointed receivers, liquidators and trustees – duties to the Court – duty of Court-appointed officer to immediately inform Court of conflict of interest or duty affecting him or her in the performance of his or her office – institution of proceedings by Court-appointed receivers against partners in receivers' firm – whether receivers must be discharged because of a real or substantial possibility of conflict between his or her personal interests or duties and those of the estate being administered pursuant to Court order – Court's power to refer segregated part of receivership or liquidation by Court-appointed officer to an independent receiver or liquidator – whether segregated part of receivership should be referred to independent receiver EQUITY – fiduciary duties – whether "Chinese wall" sufficient to address a real possibility of conflict of interest or duty where Court-appointed receiver brings or may need to bring proceedings against one or more of his or her own partners
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate