Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Nield v Mathieson [2014] FCA 29 Citation: Nield v Mathieson [2014] FCA 29
Appeal from: Mathieson v South End Mixed Business [2013] FCCA 1749
Parties: MARJORIE JEAN NIELD and KETH GEORGE NIELD v BETH LENNESE MATHIESON
File number: VID 30 of 2014
Judge: JESSUP J
Date of judgment: 4 February 2014
Catchwords: APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – Application for leave to appeal – Orders which, though interlocutory, were substantive ones having final effect
Date of hearing: 30 January 2014
Place: Melbourne
Division: FAIR WORK DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 8
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr M McKenney
Solicitor for the Applicants: Garden & Green Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr J McKenna
Solicitor for the Respondent: Beck Legal
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY FAIR WORK DIVISION VID 30 of 2014
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: MARJORIE JEAN NIELD
First Applicant
KETH GEORGE NIELD
Second Applicant
AND: BETH LENNESE MATHIESON
Respondent
JUDGE: JESSUP J DATE OF ORDER: 4 FEBRUARY 2014 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicants have leave to appeal from Orders 1, 2 and 3 made by the Federal Circuit Court of Australia in proceeding MLG 650/2012 on 23 December 2013, such appeal to be filed by 4.00 pm on 4 February 2014. 2. The operation of Orders 1, 2 or 3 made by the Federal Circuit Court on 23 December 2013 be stayed pending the hearing and determination of an appeal lodged pursuant to the leave granted above. 3. Subject to any order made by the Full Court, the costs of the application for leave to appeal be reserved. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate