Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Cao v Secretary, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs [2014] FCA 52 Citation: Cao v Secretary, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs [2014] FCA 52
Appeal from: Cao and Secretary, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs [2013] AATA 591
Parties: ZIMING CAO v SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILIES, HOUSING, COMMUNITY SERVICES AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
File number: NSD 1934 of 2013
Judge: WIGNEY J
Date of judgment: 14 February 2014
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal from the Administrative Appeals Tribunal – applicant received benefits under the Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) – whether deposits into the applicant's bank account constituted income for the purposes of the Act – whether an overpayment occurred due to undisclosed deposits – whether the debt should be waived due to special circumstances ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – whether an application raises a question of law – whether the facts fall within the terms of a statutory provision properly construed – whether there was any rationally probative evidence capable of supporting a finding by the Tribunal
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) Social Security Act 1991 (Cth)
Cases cited: Abebe v The Commonwealth (1999) 197 CLR 510 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 Australian National Railways Commission v Collector of Customs (SA) (1985) 8 FCR 264 Australian Postal Commission v Sellick [2008] FCA 236 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Saxby Bridge Financial Planning Pty Ltd (2003) 133 FCR 290 Australian Telecommunications Corp v Lambroglou (1990) 12 AAR 515 Birdseye v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2003) 38 AAR 55 Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic Enterprises (1993) 43 FCR 280 Comcare v Etheridge (2006) 149 FCR 522 Comcare v Rowe (2002) 35 AAR 410 Commissioner of Taxation v Perkins (1993) 26 ATR 8 Defence Force Retirement and Death Benefits Authority v House (2009) 49 AAR 525 Ergon Energy Corp Limited v Commissioner of Taxation (2006) 153 FCR 551 Goodricke v Comcare [2011] FCA 694; 122 ALD 546 Hill v Repatriation Commission (2005) 218 ALR 251 Hoe v Manningham City Council [2011] VSC 37 Hope v Bathurst City Council (1980) 144 CLR 1 Kolya v Tax Practitioners Board [2012] FCA 215 Kowalski v Repatriation Commission [2011] FCAFC 43 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 Rana v Repatriation Commission (2011) 126 ALD 1 Rawson Finances Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2013) 296 ALR 307 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Applicants S134/2002 (2003) 211 CLR 441 Secretary Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations v Ergin [2010] FCA 1438; 119 ALD 155 Tobacco Institute of Australia Ltd v National Health and Medical Research Council (1996) 71 FCR 265
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate