Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BZADM v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 72 Citation: BZADM v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 72
Appeal from: BZADM v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2013] FCCA 1563
Parties: BZADM v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: QUD 721 of 2013
Judge: MARSHALL J
Date of judgment: 13 February 2014
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 36(2)(a)
Cases cited: Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259
Date of hearing: 11 February 2014
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 16
Counsel for the Appellant: The Appellant appeared for himself.
Counsel for the Respondents: Ms K Slack
Solicitor for the Respondents: Sparke Helmore Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 721 of 2013
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: BZADM
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: MARSHALL J DATE OF ORDER: 11 february 2014 WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 721 of 2013
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate