Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Shaw v MAB Corporation Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCA 88 Citation: Shaw v MAB Corporation Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCA 88
Parties: JOHN RASHLEIGH SHAW v MAB CORPORATION PTY LTD (ACN 065 207 230), MAB DOCKLANDS PTY LTD (ACN 078 029 633), YARRANOVA PTY LTD (ACN 077 517 616), NEWQUAY STAGE 2 PTY LTD (ACN 086 482 644), ARNOLD BLOCH LEIBLER (ABN 062 7868T), ABL FIDUCIARY CORP PTY LTD (ACN 005 524 952), ABL & CO CUSTODIANS PTY LTD (ACN 017 586 898), ANTHONY CALVI, IAN MICHAEL SMITH and ALEXANDER WILLIAM KING
File number: VID 796 of 2013
Judge: JESSUP J
Date of judgment: 17 February 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Costs – Proceeding held to constitute abuse of process – Whether basis for award of indemnity costs.
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 40.02(a)
Cases cited: Shaw v MAB Corporation Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 1231
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Date of last submissions: 6 December 2013
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 5
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant did not provide submissions in relation to costs.
Counsel for the Respondents: B Jellis
Solicitor for the Respondents: Arnold Bloch Leibler
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 796 of 2013
BETWEEN: JOHN RASHLEIGH SHAW
Applicant
AND: MAB CORPORATION PTY LTD (ACN 065 207 230)
First Respondent
MAB DOCKLANDS PTY LTD (ACN 078 029 633)
Second Respondent
YARRANOVA PTY LTD (ACN 077 517 616)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate