Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Plaintiff M46 of 2013 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 90 Citation: Plaintiff M46 of 2013 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 90
Parties: PLAINTIFF M46 OF 2013 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION, OFFICER IN CHARGE, MELBOURNE IMMIGRATION TRANSIT ACCOMMODATION, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
File number: VID 793 of 2013
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 21 February 2014
Corrigendum: 24 February 2014
Catchwords: MIGRATION – refusal of visa on character grounds – visa refused under s 501 of the Migration Act – whether Minister erred by failing to correctly apply the character test – whether Minister misconstrued s 198 of the Migration Act – whether Minister's decision to refuse applicant a visa was illogical and/or irrational – whether Minister provided adequate reasons for his decision – whether the certificate issued by Minister under s 502 of the Migration Act was valid PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – discovery – public interest immunity – whether public interest immunity claim over assessments should be upheld
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 25D Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979 (Cth) ss 4, 17, 35, 36, Part IV Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 22 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5, 36, 189, 196, 198, 501, 501G, 502, 503A, Part 9 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth)
Cases cited: AB v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 910 – cited Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic (1993) 43 FCR 280 – cited Commonwealth v Northern Land Council (1993) 176 CLR 604 – cited Conway v Rimmer [1968] AC 910 – considered Gypsy Jokers Motorcycle Club Inc v Commissioner of Police (2008) 234 CLR 532 – cited Howells v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 139 FCR 580 – cited Parkin v O'Sullivan (2009) 260 ALR 503 – applied Philip Morris Inc v Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd (1981) 148 CLR 457 – cited Plaintiff M47/2012 v Director-General of Security (2012) 292 ALR 243 – considered Plaintiff M76/2013 v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural Affairs and Citizenship (2013) 304 ALR 135 – cited Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS (2010) 240 CLR 611 – considered Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 – considered Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 – cited MZYYO v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2013) 214 FCR 68 – applied Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Palme (2003) 216 CLR 212 – cited Sagar v O'Sullivan (2001) 193 FCR 311 – considered SBEG v Secretary, Department of Immigration and Citizenship (2012) 291 ALR 281 – considered State of Victoria v Seal Rocks Victoria (Aust) Pty Ltd (2001) 3 VR 1 – cited The Church of Scientology Inc v Woodward (1982) 154 CLR 25 – cited WAKJ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1336 – cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate