Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ravesi v National Australia Bank Limited [2014] FCA 99 Citation: Ravesi v National Australia Bank Limited [2014] FCA 99
Parties: PAUL RAVESI v NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED, PETER MOORE and MLC LIMITED
File number: SAD 263 of 2012
Judge: MANSFIELD J
Date of judgment: 19 February 2014
Catchwords: NEGLIGENCE – duty of care – causation – contributory negligence – insurance adviser – whether adviser properly implemented instructions of insured
Legislation: Trade Practices Act 1975 (Cth) s 52 (now s 18 of the Australian Consumer Law as Schedule 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth))
Cases cited: O'Connor v BDB Kirby & Co [1972] 1 QB 90 distinguished ACN 068 691 092 Pty Ltd v Plan 4 Insurance Services Pty Ltd (2012) 112 SASR 329 distinguished
Date of hearing: 16-20 December 2013 and 16 January 2014
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 89
Counsel for the Plaintiff: The Plaintiff appeared in person
Counsel for the Defendants: S Cole
Solicitor for the Defendants: Fisher Jeffries
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 263 of 2012
BETWEEN: PAUL RAVESI
Plaintiff
AND: NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED
First Defendant
PETER MOORE
Second Defendant
MLC LIMITED
Third Defendant
JUDGE: MANSFIELD J DATE OF ORDER: 19 FEBRUARY 2014 WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. There is to be judgment in favour of the plaintiff against the first and second defendants in the sum of $110,460. 2. The claim against the third defendant be dismissed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate