Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian and International Pilots Association v Qantas Airways Limited (No 2) [2014] FCA 109 Citation: Australian and International Pilots Association v Qantas Airways Limited (No 2) [2014] FCA 109
Parties: AUSTRALIAN AND INTERNATIONAL PILOTS ASSOCIATION, JASON THOMAS HYDE, CHRISTOPHER DICKSON, CRAIG HARMON, CHRISTOPHER GIBSON, PETER GREEN, NATHAN MILES, MATTHEW ALLEN, SEAN MCCARTHY, SEAN TESORIERO and RAMSES RAYMOND LICH v QANTAS AIRWAYS LIMITED (ACN 009 661 901)
File number: VID 1462 of 2011
Judge: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 19 February 2014
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – interpretation of certified agreements – whether respondent breached certified agreements because it failed to consider and select applicant pilots for particular positions – application dismissed
Legislation: Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009 (Cth) Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 (Cth) Schs 3, 16 Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) Pt 4-1
Cases cited: Kucks v CSR Limited (1996) 66 IR 182
Date of hearing: 8 and 9 October 2013
Place: Melbourne
Division: FAIR WORK DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 48
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr M Rinaldi
Solicitor for the Applicants: Mr J Nguyen of Australian and International Pilots Association
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr C O'Grady
Solicitor for the Respondent: Ashurst Australia
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY FAIR WORK DIVISION VID 1462 of 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate