Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kumar v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 115 Citation: Kumar v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 115
Appeal from: Kumar v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2013] FCCA 1860
Parties: AJAY KUMAR v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: VID 1150 of 2013
Judge: NORTH J
Date of judgment: 12 February 2014 Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 36.75(1)(a)(i)
Date of hearing: 12 February 2014
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 4
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant did not appear.
Counsel for the Respondents: Ms S Burchell
Solicitor for the Respondents: Clayton Utz
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 1150 of 2013
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: AJAY KUMAR
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION
First Respondent
MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: NORTH J DATE OF ORDER: 12 FEBRUARY 2014 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 1150 of 2013
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: AJAY KUMAR
Appellant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate