Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Burke v Comcare [2014] FCA 169 Citation: Burke v Comcare [2014] FCA 169
Parties: DOMINIC BURKE v COMCARE
File number(s): QUD 704 of 2013
Judge(s): GREENWOOD J
Date of judgment: 25 February 2014
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – consideration of an application under r 33.13 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 to extend time for the commencement of an appeal under s 44(2A) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal 1975 (Cth) – consideration of whether an arguable question of law is raised by the applicant's proposed notice of appeal
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal 1975 (Cth), ss 25, 43, 44(1), 44(2A) Safety Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth), ss 4, 7(4), 14, 53, 54 Federal Court Rules 2011, r 33.13
Date of hearing: 25 February 2014
Date of last submissions: 25 February 2014
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 54
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr G Del Villar
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 704 of 2013
BETWEEN: DOMINIC BURKE
Applicant
AND: COMCARE
Respondent
JUDGE: GREENWOOD J DATE OF ORDER: 25 FEBRUARY 2014 WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application is dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the application. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate