Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Brosnan v Katke [2014] FCA 184 Citation: Brosnan v Katke [2014] FCA 184
Parties: MICHAEL BROSNAN, LEON BROSNAN, MARY BROSNAN, ALAN GEE, ALAN BAWDEN GRANT, BARBARA LEE GRANT, ALAN DAVID GRANT, MICHAEL CURLY and GRAEME JOINER v JEFFREY JAMES KATKE, METAGENICS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 113 937 572), METAGENICS INC and JEFFREY BLAND
File number(s): QUD 384 of 2012
Judge(s): GREENWOOD J
Date of judgment: 6 March 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – consideration of an interlocutory application to amend the applicants' statement of claim in the proceeding – consideration of an application for further discovery having regard to the proposed amendments
Date of hearing: 26 February 2014
Date of last submissions: 26 February 2014
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 68
Counsel for the Applicants: M D Martin QC with A Nicholas
Solicitor for the Applicants: Mills Oakley
Counsel for the Respondents: A Pomeranke QC
Solicitor for the Respondents: Johnson Winter & Slattery
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD 384 of 2012
BETWEEN: MICHAEL BROSNAN
First Applicant
LEON BROSNAN
Second Applicant
MARY BROSNAN
Third Applicant
ALAN GEE
Fourth Applicant
ALAN BAWDEN GRANT
Fifth Applicant
BARBARA LEE GRANT
Sixth Applicant
ALAN DAVID GRANT
Seventh Applicant
MICHAEL CURLY
Eighth Applicant
GRAEME JOINER
Ninth Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate