Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kaur v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 188 Citation: Kaur v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 188
Appeal from: Kaur v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2013] FCCA 2329
Parties: PARBINDER KAUR v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 2565 of 2013
Judge: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 5 March 2014
Catchwords: MIGRATION – purported appeal from judgment of Federal Circuit Court after dismissal of application for failure of applicant to appear at hearing PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether judgment of Federal Circuit Court final or interlocutory – whether purported appeal incompetent because leave to appeal required by s 24(1A) of Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 24(1A) Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth), rr 13.03C(1)(c), 16.05
Cases cited: Dai v Michael Roberts Strata Management Services Ltd [2000] FCA 680 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 MZWXC v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 172 NAOU of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 406 Perera v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCA 1417
Date of hearing: 5 March 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate