Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Breast Check Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 190 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Breast Check Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 190
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v BREAST CHECK PTY LTD ACN 119 038 274 and ALEXANDRA BOYD
File number: WAD 515 of 2011
Judge: BARKER J
Date of judgment: 10 March 2014
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – misleading or deceptive conduct – identification of target audience for alleged contravening conduct – whether various breast imaging pamphlets, breast health reports and report information were distributed "to the public" – whether risk of cancer representation, assurance representation and substitute for mammography representation were conveyed – whether representations were accurate – whether representations were conveyed that devices used for breast imaging had performance characteristics, uses or benefits they did not have – accessorial liability
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) s 137H, Sch 2, s 18, s 29(1)(g), s 155, s 224, s 224(1)(e), s 232, s 232(1)(e), s 246, s 246(1)(b) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 21 Trade Practices Act 1975 (Cth) s 52, s 53(c), s 75B(1)(c), s 76E, s 86C, s 155 Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) s 42
Cases cited: .au Domain Administration Limited v Domain Names Australia Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 424; (2004) 207 ALR 521 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v National Exchange Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 955; (2003) 202 ALR 24 Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Limited [2004] HCA 60; (2004) 218 CLR 592 Campbell v Backoffice Investments Pty Ltd [2009] HCA 25; (2009) 238 CLR 304 Campomar Sociedad Limitada v Nike International Limited [2000] HCA 12; (2000) 202 CLR 45 Fencott v Muller [1983] HCA 12; (1983) 152 CLR 570 Medical Benefits Fund of Australia Limited v Cassidy [2003] FCAFC 289; (2003) 135 FCR 1 Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd [1982] HCA 44; (1982) 149 CLR 191 Rural Press Limited v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2003] HCA 75; (2003) 216 CLR 53 Taco Co of Australia Inc v Taco Bell Pty Ltd (1982) 42 ALR 177 Yorke v Lucas [1985] HCA 65; (1985) 158 CLR 661
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate