Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Whitford Grove Pty Ltd v Hughes [2014] FCA 195 Citation: Whitford Grove Pty Ltd v Hughes [2014] FCA 195
Parties: WHITFORD GROVE PTY LTD (ACN 067 234 397) v RICHARD PAUL HUGHES AND DEBORAH IRENE MAUD HUGHES and MICROANALYSIS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 133 060787)
File number: WAD 24 of 2013
Judge: BARKER J
Date of judgment: 10 March 2014
Catchwords: COSTS – whether costs order should be made – mediated outcome without contested hearing – whether plaintiff substantially successful in proceeding – whether unreasonable behaviour
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 234
Cases cited: Re Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs; Ex parte Lai Qin [1997] HCA 6; (1997) 186 CLR 622 Edwards Madigan Torzillo Briggs Pty Ltd v Stack [2003] NSWCA 302
Date of hearing: 28 January 2014
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 34
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Mr DJ Jackson
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Richard Rowick
Counsel for the First Defendant: Mr KA Dundo
Solicitor for the First Defendant: HopgoodGanim
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 24 of 2013
BETWEEN: WHITFORD GROVE PTY LTD (ACN 067 234 397)
Plaintiff
AND: RICHARD PAUL HUGHES AND DEBORAH IRENE MAUD HUGHES
First Defendant
MICROANALYSIS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD (ACN 133 060787)
Second Defendant
JUDGE: BARKER J DATE OF ORDER: 10 MARCH 2014 WHERE MADE: PERTH
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate