Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Panjeta v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 206 Citation: Panjeta v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 206
Appeal from: Panjeta v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2013] FCCA 2293
Parties: PARDEEP PANJETA v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: SAD 348 of 2013
Judge: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 6 March 2014
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 36.75
Date of hearing: 6 March 2014
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 5
Counsel for the Appellant: The Appellant did not appear
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr N Swan
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Sparke Helmore
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 348 of 2013
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: PARDEEP PANJETA
Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION
First Respondent
MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: BESANKO J DATE OF ORDER: 6 MARCH 2014 WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal, including the notice of objection to competency. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 348 of 2013
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate