Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Forty Two International Pty Limited v Barnes [2014] FCA 217 Citation: Forty Two International Pty Limited v Barnes [2014] FCA 217
Parties: FORTY TWO INTERNATIONAL PTY LIMITED ACN 095 622 889, BLUEFREEWAY LIMITED ACN 112 262 819 and THE GANG OF 4 PTY LTD ACN 095 624 678 v KIM BARNES and LEE HAWKSLEY
File number(s): NSD 2018 of 2008
Judge(s): GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 14 March 2014
Catchwords: COSTS – s 43 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – discretion to apportion costs – whether circumstances justify apportionment of costs between the parties according to their success or failure on separate issues – application of principles in Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd (No 3) [2007] FCAFC 119
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Cases cited: Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd (No 3) [2007] FCAFC 119 REA Group Ltd v Real Estate 1 Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCA 968
Date of hearing: 3 - 21 December 2012
Date of last submissions: 4 March 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 17
Counsel for the Applicants: J M Ireland QC and J Burn
Solicitor for the Applicants: Argyle Lawyers Pty Ltd
Counsel for the Respondents: R E Dubler SC and A Shearer
Solicitor for the Respondents: Herbert Geer Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 2018 of 2008
BETWEEN: FORTY TWO INTERNATIONAL PTY LIMITED ACN 095 622 889
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate