Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Shaw v MAB Corporation Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCA 227 Citation: Shaw v MAB Corporation Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCA 227
Appeal from: Shaw v MAB Corporation Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 1231
Parties: JOHN SHAW v MAB CORPORATION PTY LTD, MAB DOCKLANDS PTY LTD, YARRANOVA PTY LTD, NEWQUAY STAGE 2 PTY LTD, ARNOLD BLOCH LEIBLER, ABC FIDUCIARY CORP PTY LTD, ABL & CO CUSTODIANS PTY LTD, MR ANTHONY CALVI, MR IAN MICHAEL SMITH and MR ALEXANDER WILLIAM KING
File number: VID 15 of 2014
Judge: MORTIMER J
Date of judgment: 14 March 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Costs – application for leave to appeal unsuccessful – applicant self-represented – respondents seek costs assessed on an indemnity basis – whether appropriate to award indemnity costs on particular facts of case – costs ordered on party-party basis.
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 40.02
Cases cited: Colgate-Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225 Fountain Selected Meats (Sales Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Pty Ltd (1988) 81 ALR 397 Gaffney v RSM Bird Cameron Partners (a Firm) (No 2) [2013] FCA 945 Hamod v New South Wales (2002) 188 ALR 659; [2002] FCA 424 Karam v Palmone Shoes Pty Ltd [2012] VSCA 97 Shaw v MAB Corporation Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 62 Shaw v MAB Corporation Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCA 88 Winn v Blueprint Instant Printing Pty Ltd (No 3) [2011] FCA 742 Wu v Avin Operations Pty Ltd (No 2) [2006] FCA 792
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate