Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZTAO v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 232 Citation: SZTAO v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 232
Appeal from: SZTAO V Minister for Immigration [2013] FCCA 1724
Parties: SZTAO v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 2287 of 2013
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 26 February 2014
Legislation: Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 (Cth) Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
Cases cited: Bienstein v Bienstein (2003) 195 ALR 225 applied SZTAO v Minister for Immigration [2013] FCCA 1724 referred to
Date of hearing: 26 February 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 18
Counsel for the Applicant: The appellant appeared by telephone
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr P Knowles
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Sparke Helmore
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 2287 of 2013
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: SZTAO
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION
First Respondent
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: RARES J DATE OF ORDER: 26 FEBRUARY 2014 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the first respondent's costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate