Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sandy on behalf of the Yugara People v State of Queensland [2014] FCA 243 Citation: Sandy on behalf of the Yugara People v State of Queensland [2014] FCA 243
Parties: DESMOND SANDY ON BEHALF OF THE YUGARA/YUGARAPUL PEOPLE, RUTH JAMES, PEARL SANDY, CONNIE ISAACS ON BEHALF OF THE TURRBAL PEOPLE and MAROOCHY BARAMBAH v STATE OF QUEENSLAND, BRISBANE CITY COUNCIL, MORETON BAY REGIONAL COUNCIL, REDLAND CITY COUNCIL, TELSTRA CORPORATION, GARRY MURPHY, BRISBANE PORT HOLDINGS PTY LTD, EDDIE RUSKA, LOGAN CITY COUNCIL, APT PETROLEUM PIPELINES PTY LTD, COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA, THE SHELL COMPANY OF AUSTRALIA LTD (ACN 004 610 459), INCITEC FERTILIZERS LTD, MOONIE PIPELINE COMPANY PTY LTD and CENTOR AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
File numbers: QUD 586 of 2011 QUD 6196 of 1998
Judge: JESSUP J
Date of judgment: 19 March 2014
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – interlocutory application under s 84(5) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) for joinder as respondent party to a native title determination application – whether interlocutory applicant's interests could be affected by the substantive proceedings – interlocutory applicant alleges misrepresentations by second applicant in the substantive proceeding in relation to the interlocutory applicant's ancestry – alleged misrepresentations not a sufficient basis for joinder
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) s 84(5)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate