Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (No 2) [2014] FCA 254 Citation: Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (No 2) [2014] FCA 254
Parties: LUCIO ROBERT PACIOCCO and SPEEDY DEVELOPMENT GROUP PTY LTD (ACN 006 835 383) v AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LIMITED (ACN 005 357 522)
File number: VID 196 of 2013
Judge: GORDON J
Date of judgment: 19 March 2014
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 7 March 2014
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 10
Counsel for the Applicants: MBJ Lee SC with JF Richardson and WAD Edwards
Solicitor for the Applicants: Maurice Blackburn
Counsel for the Respondent: AC Archibald QC with MH O'Bryan SC and C Van Proctor
Solicitor for the Respondent: Ashurst Australia
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 196 of 2013
BETWEEN: LUCIO ROBERT PACIOCCO
First Applicant
SPEEDY DEVELOPMENT GROUP PTY LTD (ACN 006 835 383)
Second Applicant
AND: AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LIMITED (ACN 005 357 522)
Respondent
JUDGE: GORDON J DATE OF ORDER: 19 MARCH 2014 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. There be no orders as to costs, including reserved costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 196 of 2013
BETWEEN: LUCIO ROBERT PACIOCCO
First Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate