Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ninan v Hannigan [2014] FCA 258 Citation: Ninan v Hannigan [2014] FCA 258
Parties: GEORGE NINAN and MOLLY GEORGE v DEPUTY DISTRICT REGISTRAR PADDY HANNIGAN, FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
File number(s): NSD 2331 of 2013 NSD 2351 of 2013 NSD 2428 of 2013
Judge(s): BENNETT J
Date of judgment: 25 March 2014
Catchwords: ADMINSTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – Federal Court Rules 2.26 and 36.02 – whether Deputy District Registrar properly exercised power to refuse to accept documents for filing
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011(Cth) rr 2.26, 36.02
Cases cited: Connelly v Director of Public Prosecutions [1964] A.C. 1254 Jago v District Court (NSW) (1989) 168 CLR 23 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng (2001) 205 CLR 507 Ninan v St George Bank Ltd [2012] FCA 905 Ninan v St George Bank Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCA 273 Ninan v St George Bank Ltd [2013] FCA 818 Ninan v Valuer- General of Western Australia [2013] FCA 789 Ninan v Valuer-General of Western Australia (No 2) [2013] FCA 1180 Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 39
Counsel for the Applicants: The Applicants appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: The Respondent filed a submitting appearance
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate