Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Naroth v Innovative Hair Loss Solutions Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 276 Citation: Naroth v Innovative Hair Loss Solutions Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 276
Appeal from: Naroth v Innovative Hair Loss Solutions Pty Ltd & Ors (No.3) [2013] FMCA 209 (28 March 2013)
Parties: NANDITA RAGINI NAROTH v INNOVATIVE HAIR LOSS SOLUTIONS PTY LTD, DEREK BEST, DEBRA BEST and ALEXANDRA MCCLUNIE
File number: WAD 107 of 2013
Judge: BARKER J
Date of judgment: 27 March 2014
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – whether respondents engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct in relation to appellant's entry into service contract under s 52 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) – whether respondents engaged in unconscionable conduct in contravention of s 51AC Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) CONTRACTS – whether service contract expressly or impliedly incorporated statutory obligations created by Occupational Safety and Health Act 1984 (WA) – whether company repudiated contract, entitling appellant to accept repudiation and terminate contract EVIDENCE – whether credibility findings against appellant should have been made
Legislation: Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 51AC, s 52 Occupational Safety and Health Act 1984 (WA)
Date of hearing: 28 November 2013
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 66
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr A Metaxas
Solicitor for the Respondents: Metaxas & Hager
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate