Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Jones v Office of the Australian Information Commissioner [2014] FCA 285 Citation: Jones v Office of the Australian Information Commissioner [2014] FCA 285
Parties: LYNETTE JONES v OFFICE OF THE AUSTRALIAN INFORMATION COMMISSIONER
File number(s): QUD 40 of 2013
Judge(s): GREENWOOD J
Date of judgment: 27 March 2014
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – consideration of an application for an order of review under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) concerning a decision of the Information Commissioner in exercising a statutory discretion to cease further investigation of a complaint made by the applicant under the provisions of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) – consideration of the nature of the statutory discretion – consideration of the conditions upon which the discretion is to be exercised – consideration of the notion of reasonableness as a feature of legality in the exercise of discretionary power – consideration of the principles derived from Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 87 ALJR 618 – consideration of the content of the statutory power and its purpose
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth), ss 5(1)(e), 5(1)(f) Privacy Act 1988 (Cth), ss 6, 6A, 6C, 6D, 13A(1), 36, 40(1), 41(1)(a), 52, Schedule 3 (National Privacy Principles) cls 2.1(h), 2.1(g), 2.2 Australian Information Commissioner Act 2010 (Cth), ss 3, 3A, 14
Cases cited: FAI Insurances Ltd v Winneke (1982) 151 CLR 342 - cited Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 - cited R v Anderson; Ex parte Ipec-Air Pty Limited (1965) 113 CLR 177 - cited Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18; 297 ALR 225; 87 ALJR 618 – cited and quoted Attorney-General (NSW) v Quin (1990) 170 CLR 1 - cited Kruger v Commonwealth (1997) 190 CLR 1 - cited Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZIAI [2009] HCA 39; 259 ALR 429; 83 ALJR 1123 - cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 197 CLR 611 – cited and quoted House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 - cited Secretary of State for Education and Science v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council [1977] AC 1014 – cited and quoted
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate