Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
N and E Bowder Pty Ltd v Australian Keg Company Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 288 Citation: N and E Bowder Pty Ltd v Australian Keg Company Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 288
Parties: N AND E BOWDER PTY LTD ACN 097 150 742, BELMARK RURAL PTY LTD ACN 111 679 693 and HAY QUEENSLAND PTY LTD ACN 110 494 454 v AUSTRALIAN KEG COMPANY PTY LTD ACN 115 412 774
File number: QUD 34 of 2014
Judge: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 28 March 2014
Catchwords: APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – application for leave to appeal – application for leave filed before orders made – whether reasons for judgment constitute "judgment" for the purposes of s 24 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – where primary judge ordered for the issues of infringement and damages to be determined in separate trials – whether determination of issue of infringement is a final or interlocutory – whether leave to appeal should be granted
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 24 and 24(1A) Patents Act 1990 (Cth) s 128(1)
Cases cited: Ah Toy v Registrar of Companies (1985) 10 FCR 280 cited Australian Builders' Labourers' Federated Union of Workers – Western Australian Branch v J-Corp Pty Limited (1993) 42 FCR 452 cited Australian Telecommunications Commission v Colpitts (1986) 12 FCR 395 cited Bodney v Bropho (2004) 140 FCR 77 at 92, [64] cited Caboche & Anor v Ramsay & Ors (1993) 119 ALR 215 cited Computer Edge Pty Ltd v Apple Computer Inc (1984) 54 ALR 767 cited Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Employment Advocate [2001] FCA 1442 cited DÉcor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 applied Fair Work Ombudsman v Toyota Material Handling (NSW) Pty Ltd (2012) 209 FCR 428 at 437 cited Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Pty Ltd v Avion Engineering Pty Ltd (1991) 103 ALR 239 cited Fraser v NRMA Holdings Ltd (1995) 55 FCR 452 cited Harmer v Oracle Corporation Australia Pty Limited (2013) 299 ALR 236 cited Hi-Fert Pty Ltd v Kiukiang Maritime Carriers Inc (1998) 86 FCR 374 cited Ho v Grigor (2006) 151 FCR 236 distinguished Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Ltd (2000) 104 FCR 564 applied Minogue v Williams [2000] FCA 125 applied NZI Securities Australia Ltd v Poignand (1994) 51 FCR 584 cited Traxys Europe SA v Balaji Coke Industry Pvt Ltd (No 2) (2012) 201 FCR 535 cited Warramunda Village Inc v Pryde (2002) 116 FCR 58 not followed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate