Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Elliott v Health Services Union [2014] FCA 296 Citation: Elliott v Health Services Union [2014] FCA 296
Parties: ROBERT ELLIOTT v HEALTH SERVICES UNION; HEALTH SERVICES UNION v ROBERT ELLIOTT, MICHAEL WILLIAMSON and KATHY JACKSON
File number: NSD 1501 of 2013
Judge: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 24 March 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether proceedings should be consolidated – whether common issues of law or fact
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 60(1) Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009 (Cth) s 329 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 30.11
Date of hearing: 24 March 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 9
Counsel for the Applicant/First Cross-Respondent: No appearance for the applicant
Counsel for the Respondent/Cross-Claimant: Mr M A Irving
Solicitor for the Respondent/Cross-Claimant: Holding Redlich
Counsel for the Second Cross-Respondent: No appearance for the second cross-respondent
Counsel for the Third Cross-Respondent: The third cross-respondent appeared in person
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1501 of 2013
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate