Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Wu v Li [2014] FCA 297 Citation: Wu v Li [2014] FCA 297
Appeal from: Li v Wu [2013] FCA 1067 Li v Wu (No 2) [2013] FCA 1265
Parties: TAO WU v YU XIN LI
File number: ACD 116 of 2013
Judge: FOSTER J
Date of judgment: 28 March 2014
Catchwords: APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – whether the Full Court should grant a stay of execution in respect of a money judgment pending determination of an appeal and cross-appeal from that judgment – relevant principles and considerations discussed. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether the Full Court should grant a stay of execution in respect of a money judgment pending determination of an appeal and cross-appeal from that judgment – relevant principles and considerations discussed.
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011, r 36.08(2)
Cases cited: Li v Wu [2013] FCA 1067 Li v Wu [2013] FCA 1265 Jennings Construction Ltd v Burgundy Royale Investments Pty Ltd (No 1) (1986) 161 CLR 681 cited Kalifair Pty Limited v Digi-Tech (Australia) Ltd (2002) 55 NSWLR 737 cited Philip Morris (Australia) Limited v Nixon [1999] FCA 1281 cited
Date of hearing: 6 and 18 March 2014
Date of last submissions: 26 March 2014
Place: Sydney (via video link to Canberra)
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 56
Counsel for the Appellant: Dr C S Ward
Solicitors for the Appellant: Dibbs Barker
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate