Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Zaghloul v Woodside Energy Limited [2014] FCA 306 Citation: Zaghloul v Woodside Energy Limited [2014] FCA 306
Parties: DR HASSAN ZAGHLOUL v WOODSIDE ENERGY LIMITED ACN 005 482 986 DR HASSAN ZAGHLOUL v WOODSIDE ENERGY LIMITED ACN 005 482 986
File numbers: WAD 492 of 2013 WAD 40 of 2014
Judge: BARKER J
Date of judgment: 28 March 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for extension of time for leave to appeal – application for leave to appeal – whether proceeding should be transferred to New South Wales district registry – allegation of apprehended bias – whether applications are an abuse of process – whether suppression and non-publication orders should be made COSTS – whether indemnity costs should be ordered
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37AG Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: Zaghloul v Woodside Energy Limited (No 2) [2013] FCA 947 Zaghloul v Woodside Energy Limited (No 3) [2014] FCA 173
Date of hearing: 28 March 2014
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 45
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr J Blackburn
Solicitor for the Respondent: Ashurst Australia
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 492 of 2013
BETWEEN: DR HASSAN ZAGHLOUL
Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate