Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sunbuild Pty Ltd v Ramsay [2014] FCA 308 Citation: Sunbuild Pty Ltd v Ramsay [2014] FCA 308
Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal: Ramsay v Sunbuild [2014] FCA 54
Parties: SUNBUILD PTY LTD v ANDREW RAMSAY, MICHAEL HUDDY, SCOTT VINK and DENNIS PETER MITCHELL
File number: NTD 7 of 2014
Judge: MANSFIELD J
Date of judgment: 31 March 2014
Date of hearing: 19 March 2014
Date of last submissions: 21 March 2014
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Counsel for the Applicant: A Wyvill SC
Solicitor for the Applicant: Squire Sanders
Counsel for the Respondents: W Friend SC
Solicitor for the Respondents: Hall Payne
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NORTHERN TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NTD 7 of 2014
BETWEEN: SUNBUILD PTY LTD
Applicant
AND: ANDREW RAMSAY
First Respondent
MICHAEL HUDDY
Second Respondent
SCOTT VINK
Third Respondent
DENNIS PETER MITCHELL
Fourth Respondent
JUDGE: MANSFIELD J DATE OF ORDER: 31 MARCH 2104 WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for leave to appeal is refused. 2. Liberty to the parties to file within 14 days brief written submissions as to the costs of the application. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NORTHERN TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NTD 7 of 2014
BETWEEN: SUNBUILD PTY LTD
Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate