Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Director of Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Cartledge [2014] FCA 311 Citation: Director of Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Cartledge [2014] FCA 311
Parties: DIRECTOR OF FAIR WORK BUILDING INDUSTRY INSPECTORATE v AARON CARTLEDGE, JIM O'CONNOR, BRENDON PITT, DAVID BOLTON, LUKE STEPHENSON and CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY, MINING AND ENERGY UNION
File number: SAD 57 of 2014
Judge: MANSFIELD J
Date of judgment: 25 March 2014
Date of hearing: 25 March 2014
Place: Adelaide
Division: FAIR WORK DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 15
Counsel for the Applicant: IM Neil SC
Solicitor for the Applicant: Clayton Utz
Counsel for the Respondent: N Healy
Solicitor for the Respondent: Lieschke & Weatherill
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY FAIR WORK DIVISION SAD 57 of 2014
BETWEEN: DIRECTOR OF FAIR WORK BUILDING INDUSTRY INSPECTORATE
Applicant
AND: AARON CARTLEDGE
First Respondent
JIM O'CONNOR
Second Respondent
BRENDAN PITT
Third Respondent
DAVID BOLTON
Fourth Respondent
LUKE STEPHENSON
Fifth Respondent
CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY, MINING AND ENERGY UNION
Sixth Respondent
JUDGE: MANSFIELD J DATE OF ORDER: 25 MARCH 2014 WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Leave to the applicant to file and serve an amended originating application to seek such final injunctions as he may be advised under s 545(2)(a) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) within seven days. 2. Leave to the applicant to file and serve any further evidence by 2 April 2014. 3. Leave to the respondents to file and serve by 23 April 2014 such affidavits as they may be advised in response to affidavits relied upon by the applicant. 4. Leave to the applicant to file and serve such affidavits as he may be advised strictly in reply by 30 April 2014. 5. Adjourn the directions hearing to 4 pm Adelaide time on 5 May 2014. 6. Pursuant to rule 1.39 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), the time for service of the originating documents upon the respondent is extended to 2 pm on 25 March 2014. 7. Liberty to apply. IN RELATION TO THE APPLICATION FOR AN INTERIM INJUNCTION, THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 8. Until further order, each of the first respondent, the second respondent, the third respondent, the fourth respondent, the fifth respondent, and any other organiser of the sixth respondent employed in its Construction and General Division, South Australian Divisional Branch, be restrained from attending the Hansen Yuncken Pty Ltd (Hansen Yuncken) project at 50 Flinders Street, Adelaide, or the project for the construction of the new Royal Adelaide Hospital in which Hansen Yuncken is engaged as a head contractor, unless they are lawfully exercising or seeking to exercise rights in accordance with Part 3-4 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). 9. Liberty to apply. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate