Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Lin v University of Melbourne [2014] FCA 315 Citation: Lin v University of Melbourne [2014] FCA 315
Parties: JIANPING LIN v UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE
File number: VID 24 of 2014
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 31 March 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for summary dismissal of proceeding – jurisdiction of the Federal Court – whether originating application had reasonable prospects of success – whether proceeding frivolous or vexatious – whether application disclosed no reasonable cause of action
Legislation: Constitution s 75 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 19, 21, 31A Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 8.05, 26.01 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B
Date of hearing: 31 March 2014
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 13
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms A Shannon
Solicitor for the Respondent: Clayton Utz
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 24 of 2014
BETWEEN: JIANPING LIN
Applicant
AND: UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE
Respondent
JUDGE: TRACEY J DATE OF ORDER: 31 MARCH 2014 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Judgment be entered for the respondent. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the proceeding. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 24 of 2014
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate