Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Oswal [2014] FCA 318 Citation: Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Oswal [2014] FCA 318
Parties: DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION v RADHIKA PANKAJ OSWAL
File number(s): WAD 95 of 2011
Judge(s): SIOPIS J
Date of judgment: 31 March 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – confidentiality orders - whether confidentiality orders should be made in relation to the amount of costs which litigant had incurred in pursuing litigation – whether disclosure of that information would prejudice the applicant in settlement negotiations.
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37AG(1)(a), 53B Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 131
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 1430 Hogan v Australian Crime Commission (2010) 240 CLR 651 Pinot Nominees Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2009) 181 FCR 392 Lake Cumberline Pty Ltd v Effem Foods Pty Ltd (1994) 126 ALR 58
Date of hearing: 19 March 2014
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 23
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr NJ Williams SC and Mr DFC Thomas
Solicitor for the Applicant: Australian Government Solicitor
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr M Walton SC and Mr A McLure
Solicitor for the Respondent: Kennedys
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate