Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Wellington Capital Limited v Waters (No 1) [2014] FCA 329 Citation: Wellington Capital Limited v Waters (No 1) [2014] FCA 329
Parties: WELLINGTON CAPITAL LIMITED ACN 114 248 458 AS RESPONSIBLE ENTITY OF THE PREMIUM INCOME FUND ARSN 090 687 577 v ANDREA JANE WATERS, KPMG, DAVID MARK ANDERSON, OCTAVIAR ADMINISTRATION PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 101 069 390, FERNANDO ESTEBAN, RAY KELLERMAN, MANAGED INVESTMENTS PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) ACN 101 634 146, MICHAEL CHRISTODOULOU KING, CRAIG ROBERT WHITE, GUY HUTCHINGS, STEVEN KRIS KYLING, STUART ROBERTSON PRICE, PAUL JOSEPH MANKA, MICHAEL GORDON HISCOCK, JOHN ARTHUR WHATELEY, JACK SIMON DIAMOND and DEBORAH BEALE
File number: NSD 557 of 2013
Judge: PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 2 April 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for non-standard discovery – Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) section 43(3)(h) – whether to make orders for payment of estimated costs of discovery in advance
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43(3)(h)
Date of hearing: 2 April 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 13
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Mr WAD Edwards and Mr JC Conde
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Johnson Winter & Slattery
Counsel for the First and Second Defendants: Mr JRJ Lockhart SC and Mr JA Arnott
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate