Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Taxsmart [2014] FCA 337 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Taxsmart [2014] FCA 337
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v TAXSMART GROUP PTY LTD, TAXSMART FRANCHISING PTY LTD, RESULTSMART PTY LTD ACN 125 894 322, SCOTT RICHARD ANDREWS and JANINE KAY ANDREWS
File number(s): VID 494 of 2013
Judge(s): DAVIES J
Date of judgment: 4 April 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory application for summary dismissal of the proceeding on the ground of abuse of process – whether issue estoppel – application dismissed
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), schedule 2, ss 18, 31 and 37(2) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rule 4.01(2) Tax Agent Services Regulations 2009 (Cth) schedule 2, part 2, division 1, regs 201(d) and 207(c)
Cases cited: Blair v Curran (1939) 62 CLR 464 Champerslife Pty Ltd v Manojlovski & Anor (2010) 75 NSWLR 245 Ramsay v Pigram (1967-1968) 118 CLR 271 Yousef v Taxsmart Group Pty Ltd & Anor [2013] FCCA 2089
Date of hearing: 27 March 2014
Date of last submissions: 27 March 2014
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 21
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr L Merrick
Solicitor for the Applicant: Corrs Chambers Westgarth Counsel for the Respondent: The Respondent appeared in person
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 494 of 2013
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate