Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Taj v Western Health (No 2) [2014] FCA 339 Citation: Taj v Western Health (No 2) [2014] FCA 339
Parties: DR SALAHUDDIN TAJ v WESTERN HEALTH and ST JOHN OF GOD HEALTH CARE INC
File number: VID 1031 of 2013
Judge: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 19 March 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory application – whether statement of claim should be struck out – whether s 570(2) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) applies to permit costs being awarded to the successful parties
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 340, 340(1) 342(1), 351(1), 352, 570(1) and (2)(b) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37N and 43(3)(f) Equal Opportunity Act 2010 (Vic) s 18 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 16.21
Date of hearing: 19 March 2014
Place: Melbourne
Division: FAIR WORK DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 17
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant did not appear
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr JRM Tracey
Solicitor for the First Respondent: TressCox Lawyers
Counsel for the Second Respondent: Mr G Pauline
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Service Industry Advisory Group (Legal) Pty Ltd
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY FAIR WORK DIVISION VID 1031 of 2013
BETWEEN: DR SALAHUDDIN TAJ
Applicant
AND: WESTERN HEALTH
First Respondent
ST JOHN OF GOD HEALTH CARE INC
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate