Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bayley & Associates Pty Ltd v DBR Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 346 Citation: Bayley & Associates Pty Ltd v DBR Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 346
Parties: BAYLEY & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD v DBR AUSTRALIA PTY LTD and NIGEL HUCKSTEP
File number: ACD 20 of 2010
Judge: FOSTER J
Date of judgment: 4 April 2014
Catchwords: COSTS – whether the Court should make a lump sum costs order – relevant principles discussed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act, 1976 (Cth), s 37M and s 37N Federal Court Rules 2011, r 40.02(b)
Cases cited: Bayley & Associates Pty Limited v DBR Australia Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 1341 related Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (No. 2) (1995) 57 FCR 119 cited Bitek Pty Limited v IConnect Pty Limited (2012) 290 ALR 288 cited Black and Decker Inc v GMCA Pty Limited (No. 4) (2008) FCA 1737 cited Dunstan v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (No. 3) [2006] FCA 916 cited Ginos Engineers Pty Limited v Autodesk Australia Pty Limited (2008) 249 ALR 371 cited Playcorp Group of Companies Pty Limited v Peter Bodum A/S (No. 2) (2010) FCA 455 cited Sony Entertainment (Australia) Limited v Smith (2005) 215 ALR 788 cited
Date of hearing: 4 April 2014
Place: Canberra
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 27
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr MJ Heath
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate