Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
No TasWind Farm Group Inc v Hydro-Electric Corporation (No 1) [2014] FCA 347 Citation: No TasWind Farm Group Inc v Hydro-Electric Corporation (No 1) [2014] FCA 347
Parties: NO TASWIND FARM GROUP INC v HYDRO-ELECTRIC CORPORATION
File number(s): TAD 33 of 2013
Judge(s): KERR J
Date of judgment: 5 February 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for summary judgment – no reasonable prospect of success – assignability of claim for damages under Australian Consumer Law
Legislation: Associations Incorporation Act 1964 (Tas) s 13 Australian Consumer Law s 236 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 s 31A
Cases cited: Boston Commercial Services Pty Ltd v GE Capital Finance Australasia Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 1352; (2006) 236 ALR 720 Campbells Cash and Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty Ltd [2006] HCA 41; (2006) 229 CLR 386 Cant; Re Novaline Pty Ltd (in liq) (ACN 006 622 933) [2011] FCA 898; (2011) 282 ALR 49 Equuscorp Pty Ltd v Haxton [2012] HCA 7; (2012) 246 CLR 498 Phelps v Western Mining Corporation (1978) 33 FLR 327 Poulton v The Commonwealth (1953) 89 CLR 540 Pritchard v Racecage Pty Ltd [1997] FCA 27; (1997) 72 FCR 203 Tobacco Institute of Australia Ltd v Australian Federation of Consumer Organisations Inc (1988) 19 FCR 469 Tosich v Tasman Investment Management Ltd [2008] FCA 377; (2008) 250 ALR 274 Trendtex Trading Corp v Credit Suisse [1982] AC 679 World Series Cricket v Parish (1977) 16 ALR 181
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate