Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Julstar Pty Ltd v Hart Trading Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 355 Citation: Julstar Pty Ltd v Hart Trading Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 355
Appeal from: Julstar Pty Ltd v Hart Trading Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 1359
Parties: JULSTAR PTY LTD ACN 122 620 400, SEMOLINA PTY LTD ACN 117 933 570 and JULIANNE STARIHA v HART TRADING PTY LTD ACN 114 806 996, COLLEEN TRACEY HART, FRONTLINE RECRUITMENT GROUP PTY LTD ACN 078 126 851 and PETER JOHN DAVIS
File number: QUD 25 of 2014
Judge: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 27 March 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – applications for security for costs of appeal – quantum of security in dispute – whether the amounts claimed for security for costs should be ordered
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37N and 56 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 36.09 and Sch 3
Cases cited: Allstate Life Insurance Co v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (1995) 134 ALR 187 applied Bryan E Fencott & Associates Pty Ltd v Eretta Pty Ltd (1987) 16 FCR 497 applied Julstar Pty Ltd v Hart Trading Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 1359 cited Stanley v Phillips (1966) 115 CLR 470 applied
Date of hearing: 27 March 2014
Place: Brisbane
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate