Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Berry v Innovia Security Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 357 Citation: Berry v Innovia Security Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 357
Parties: BENOY BERRY and GLOBAL SECURE CURRENCY LIMITED (COMPANY NUMBER 05127761) v INNOVIA SECURITY PTY LTD, FORMERLY KNOWN AS SECURENCY PTY LTD (ACN 072 353 452)
File number(s): NSD 2597 of 2013
Judge(s): BUCHANAN J
Date of judgment: 8 April 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – security for costs – applicants resident in the United Kingdom with no assets in Australia – whether security for costs should relate to the costs of the proceedings or the costs of enforcing judgment in the United Kingdom
Cases cited: Austin, Nichols & Co Inc v Lodestar Anstalt [2009] FCA 1228 Barton v Minister for Foreign Affairs (1984) 2 FCR 463 Farmitalia Carlo Erba SrL v Delta West Pty Ltd (1994) 28 IPR 336 Logue v Hansen Technologies Ltd (2003) 125 FCR 590 Maxim's Caterers Limited v Magnona Pty Ltd (No 1) [2010] FCA 450 Ogawa v The University of Melbourne [2004] FCA 491 PS Chellaram & Co Ltd v China Ocean Shipping Co (1991) 102 ALR 321
Date of hearing: 25 March 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 43
Counsel for the Applicants: Dr C S Ward
Solicitor for the Applicants: Marque Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr C Juebner
Solicitor for the Respondent: K&L Gates
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 2597 of 2013
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate