Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
John Holland Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (No 2) [2014] FCA 372 Citation: John Holland Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (No 2) [2014] FCA 372
Parties: JOHN HOLLAND PTY LTD v CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY, MINING AND ENERGY UNION and FAIR WORK COMMISSION
File number(s): WAD 411 of 2012
Judge(s): SIOPIS J
Date of judgment: 10 April 2014
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers.
Date of last submissions: 3 April 2014
Place: Perth
Division: FAIR WORK DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 6
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Stuart Wood SC and Mr Richard Dalton
Solicitor for the Applicant: Kelly Hazell Quill Lawyers
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr Robert Reitano
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY FAIR WORK DIVISION WAD 411 of 2012
BETWEEN: JOHN HOLLAND PTY LTD
Applicant
AND: CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY, MINING AND ENERGY UNION
First Respondent
FAIR WORK COMMISSION
Second Respondent
JUDGE: SIOPIS J DATE OF ORDER: 10 APRIL 2014 WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The Fair Work Commission hear and determine the appeal by the first respondent in C No 4132 of 2012 according to law. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY FAIR WORK DIVISION WAD 411 of 2012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate