Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Damorgold Pty Ltd v JAI Products Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCA 377 Citation: Damorgold Pty Ltd v JAI Products Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCA 377
Parties: DAMORGOLD PTY LTD (ACN 051 905 705) and VERTILUX CORPORATION PTY LTD (ACN 074 643 182) v JAI PRODUCTS PTY LTD (ACN 126 185 377); JAI PRODUCTS PTY LTD (ACN 126 185 377); DAMORGOLD PTY LTD (ACN 051 905 705) and VERTILUX CORPORATION PTY LTD (ACN 074 643 182)
File number: VID 1051 of 2010
Judge: MIDDLETON J
Date of judgment: 14 April 2014
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 Patents Act 1990 (Cth), s 22, 105, 140, 187
Cases cited: BHP Billiton Iron Ore Pty Ltd v National Competition Council (No 2) [2007] FCA 557 Courtney v Medtel Pty Limited (No 3) [2004] FCA 347 Damorgold Pty Ltd v JAI Products Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 150 Eli Lilly and Company v Pfizer Research and Development Company NV/SA [2003] FCA 988 ICI Chemicals v Lubrizol [1999] FCA 1417 Lockwood Security Products v Doric Products (No 2) (2007) 235 CLR 173 Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) (2001) 155 FCR 229 Sigma Pharmaceuticals (Australia) Pty Ltd v Wyeth (No 3) [2011] FCAFC 165
Date of hearing: 4 April 2014
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 44
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr G McGowan SC with Dr W Rothnie
Solicitor for the Applicants: Philips Ormonde Fitzpatrick Lawyers
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate