Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Gomes v United Super Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 392 Citation: Gomes v United Super Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 392 Parties: JOSE MANUEL GOMES v UNITED SUPER PTY LTD and HANNOVER LIFE RE OF AUSTRALASIA LTD
File number(s): NSD 1806 of 2013
Judge(s): BUCHANAN J
Date of judgment: 23 April 2014
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – s 46 of the Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993 (Cth) – appeal on a question of law – appeal founded solely on contested fact – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993 (Cth), s 46
Cases cited: Soames v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2014] FCA 295
Date of hearing: 2 April 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 10
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr S J Walsh
Solicitor for the Respondents: Turks Legal
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1806 of 2013
ON APPEAL FROM THE SUPERANNUATION COMPLAINTS TRIBUNAL
BETWEEN: JOSE MANUEL GOMES
Appellant
AND: UNITED SUPER PTY LTD
First Respondent
HANNOVER LIFE RE OF AUSTRALASIA LTD
Second Respondent
JUDGE: BUCHANAN J DATE OF ORDER: 23 april 2014 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed with costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 1806 of 2013
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate