Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Taylor v Saloniklis (No 2) [2014] FCA 410 Citation: Taylor v Saloniklis (No 2) [2014] FCA 410
Parties: LYNETTE SU-YIN TAYLOR & ORS v SUZANNA SALONIKLIS & ORS
File number: SAD 336 of 2012
Judge: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 30 April 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for appointment of Court expert – rule 23.01 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – valuation of interests in partnership and related trust – where valuation methodology in dispute – where proposed questions involve issues of fact, construction and law – whether appointment of Court expert will contribute to the just, efficient and cost-effective management of the proceeding – whether appointment of court expert will narrow the issues in dispute in the proceeding – whether the parties are likely to challenge the findings of a Court expert. Held: Application dismissed.
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 23.01
Cases cited: Tyler v Thomas (2006) 150 FCR 357
Date of hearing: 28 February 2014
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 16
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr I Neil SC with Mr P Moorhouse
Solicitor for the Applicants: Petrine Costigan Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr R Whitington QC with Dr Bleby SC
Solicitor for the Respondents: EMA Legal
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION SAD 336 of 2012
BETWEEN: LYNETTE SU-YIN TAYLOR & ORS
Applicants
AND: SUZANNA SALONIKLIS & ORS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate