Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Shurat HaDin, Israel Law Center v Lynch (No 2) [2014] FCA 413 Citation: Shurat HaDin, Israel Law Center v Lynch (No 2) [2014] FCA 413
Parties: SHURAT HADIN - THE ISRAEL LAW CENTER, DAVID HANS LANGE, JONATHAN ROSE, ANDREW HAMILTON and GREEN FREEDOM LIMITED (ISRAEL COMPANY NUMBER 514 331 479) v JAKE LYNCH
File number: NSD 2235 of 2013
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 24 April 2014
Catchwords: COSTS – maximum costs order – human rights litigation COSTS – security for costs – applicants ordinarily resident outside Australia – real property of one of the applicants within Australia – whether undertaking to the Court not to diminish or dispose of interests in and not to further encumber the real property identified appropriate PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – human rights litigation – whether material facts on which the applicants relied adequately stated
Legislation: Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) ss 46PO, 46PR Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37N, 56 Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) ss 9, 11, 13, 15, 16, 17 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 1.40, 19.01, 40.51
Cases cited: Baird v Queensland (2005) 146 FCR 571; [2005] FCA 1516 Baird v Queensland (2006) 156 FCR 451; [2006] FCAFC 162 Brandy v Human Rights & Equal Opportunity Commission (1995) 183 CLR 245 Bropho v Western Australia [2004] FCA 1209 Corcoran v Virgin Blue Airlines Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 864 Ebrard v Gassier (1884) 28 Ch D 232 Ewin v Vergara (No 3) [2013] FCA 1311 Hanisch v Strive Pty Limited (1997) 74 FCR 384 Haraksin v Murrays Australia Ltd (2010) 275 ALR 520; [2010] FCA 1133 Hinchliffe v University of Sydney (2004) 186 FLR 376; [2004] FMCA 85 Iliafi v The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints Australia [2014] FCAFC 26 King v Virgin Australia Airlines Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 36 Maunchest Pty Ltd v Bickford (Unreported, Federal Court of Australia, NG808 of 1992, 7 July 1993) Muller v Human Rights & Equal Opportunity Commission [1997] FCA 634 Ninan v St George Bank Ltd (2012) 294 ALR 190; [2012] FCA 905 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; [1998] HCA 11 P S Chellaram & Co Ltd v China Ocean Shipping Co (1991) 102 ALR 321; [1991] HCA 36 Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) (2001) 115 FCR 229; [2001] FCA 1865 Sacks v Permanent Trustee Australia Ltd (1993) 45 FCR 509 Spotwire Pty Ltd v Visa International Service Association (No 2) [2004] FCA 571 Walker v Victoria [2012] FCAFC 38
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate