Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Reaper v Baycorp Collections PDL (Australia) Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 426 Citation: Reaper v Baycorp Collections PDL (Australia) Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 426
Appeal from: Application for extension of time: Reaper v Baycorp Collections PDL (Australia) Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 13
Parties: BRETT REAPER v BAYCORP COLLECTIONS PDL (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD and PETR VRSECKY AS TRUSTEE OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF BRETT VINCENT REAPER
File number: VID 121 of 2014
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 30 April 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for extension of time to file notice of appeal – whether plausible reason for delay in commencing appeal – whether it is in the interests of justice that extension be granted – application dismissed
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 109, 153B Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 36.03, 36.04, 42.11
Cases cited: Duff v Freijah (1982) 62 FLR 280 – cited Jackamarra v Krakourer (1998) 195 CLR 516 – cited Jess v Scott (1986) 12 FCR 187 – cited Lucic v Nolan (1982) 45 ALR 411 – cited Re Papps; Ex Parte Tapp (1997) 78 FCR 524 – cited Reaper v Baycorp Collections PDL (Australia) Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 13 – cited
Date of hearing: 18 March 2014 and 30 April 2014
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 19
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate