Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Lisica v Commissioner of Patents [2014] FCA 433 Citation: Lisica v Commissioner of Patents [2014] FCA 433
Parties: SVETKO LISICA v COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS
File number: VID 843 of 2013
Judge: JESSUP J
Date of judgment: 7 May 2014
Catchwords: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – patents – application for standard patent – claims – whether clear and succinct
Legislation: Patents Act 1990 (Cth) ss 40, 49, 51 and 59
Cases cited: Imperial Chemical Industries Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents (2004) 213 ALR 399 National Research Development Corporation v Commissioner of Patents (1959) 102 CLR 252
Date of hearing: 10 April 2014
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 18
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: B Fitzpatrick with C Cunliffe
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 843 of 2013
BETWEEN: SVETKO LISICA
Applicant
AND: COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS
Respondent
JUDGE: JESSUP J DATE OF ORDER: 7 MAY 2014 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The parties file and serve written submissions as to costs, as follows: (a) the respondent, within 14 days; (b) the applicant, within a further 14 days; and (c) the respondent in reply, if necessary, within a further 7 days. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate