Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Oswal (No 2) [2014] FCA 463 Citation: Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Oswal (No 2) [2014] FCA 463
Parties: DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION v RADHIKA PANKAJ OSWAL
File number(s): WAD 95 of 2011
Judge(s): SIOPIS J
Date of judgment: 9 May 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – judgment obtained against the respondent in the sum of $186,321,790.11 – freezing order precluded the respondent from removing, or dealing with, or diminishing the value of the respondent's assets in Australia up to the unencumbered value of the judgment sum – the respondent's main asset is legal claims made against parties in Australia – the respondent has entered into a litigation funding agreement with a company in Dubai in the United Arab Emirates – application to amend the freezing order to permit the respondent to enter into a litigation funding agreement. Legislation: Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) Sch 1 s 260-5
Date of hearing: 10 and 19 March 2014
Date of last submissions: 22 April 2014
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 27
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr NJ Williams SC and Mr DFC Thomas
Solicitor for the Applicant: Australia Government Solicitor
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr M Walton SC and Mr A McLure
Solicitor for the Respondent: Kennedys
Counsel for Mercury Services Limited: Ms KR Lendich
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 95 of 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate