Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Liu v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 469 Citation: Liu v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 469
Appeal from: Liu & Ors v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2013] FCCA 2208
Parties: DESHENG LIU, QI GUAN and XUANCHEN LIU v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 2599 of 2013
Judge: MARSHALL J
Date of judgment: 12 May 2014
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 347(1)(b) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) regs 4.10, 4.11(1)(d)
Date of hearing: 12 May 2014
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Counsel for the appellants: The first appellant appeared for the appellants.
Counsel for the respondents: Ms SA Given
Solicitor for the respondents: Sparke Helmore
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 2599 of 2013
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: DESHENG LIU
First Appellant
QI GUAN
Second Appellant
XUANCHEN LIU
Third Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION
First Respondent
MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
JUDGE: MARSHALL J DATE OF ORDER: 12 MAY 2014 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. The appellants pay the first respondent Minister's costs of the appeal. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate