Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ghanem v Australian Research Council [2014] FCA 473 Citation: Ghanem v Australian Research Council [2014] FCA 473
Parties: ASHRAF GHANEM v AUSTRALIAN RESEARCH COUNCIL and MINISTER FOR EDUCATION
File number: ACD 125 of 2013
Judge: FOSTER J
Date of judgment: 13 May 2014
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether the applicant's claims for relief should be summarily dismissed because the applicant has no reasonable prospect of prosecuting any of them
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth), s 5(1) and 13(1) Australian Research Council Act 2001 (Cth), ss 51, 52(3)(d), 53, 59 and 60, Pt 7, Div 1 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 31A Federal Court Rules 2011, r 26.01
Cases cited: Shammas v Canberra Institute of Technology [2014] FCA 71 Spencer v Commonwealth (2010) 241 CLR 118 Sutton v Commissioner of Taxation (1959) 100 CLR 518
Date of hearing: 4 April 2014
Place: Sydney (via video link to Canberra) (heard in Canberra)
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 79 Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person Counsel for the Respondents: Mr J Davidson Solicitor for the Respondents: Australian Government Solicitor
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION ACD 125 of 2013
BETWEEN: ASHRAF GHANEM
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate